- Stunning: Ikea "Homemade Is Best" cookbook images. Carl Kleiner's photos that illustrate Ikea's new cookbook are simply amazing-- and beautiful.
- Cool Cars: "The Little Cars that Moved Europe". This little vehicles are incredible, both in their design and their function. Why aren't we doing more of this today?
- Scary: "Helmet Safety Unchanged as Injury Concerns Rise". A good piece from the NY Times about football helmets and how they don't really do what we think they should.
- Smart: "Seven Reasons Halloween Judgment Houses Often Miss the Mark". This is a very insightful post from Dr. Russell Moore, a VP and faculty member at Southern Baptist Seminary. This hits on concerns that I've had for a while, but haven't ever articulated as succinctly.
- Interesting: "Twinkie Diet Helps Nutrition Professor Lose 27 Pounds". Maybe this is the diet for me...
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Bits and Tidbits, November 2010
Friday, November 12, 2010
Vacation...
We're going on a trip...
We'll be in Charlotte and in Columbia for a little under a week, then traveling and resting in Tennessee for another several days.
While in Charlotte, I have the privilege to give a couple of lectures at Reformed Theological Seminary. If you think of it, please pray for me to be of some use to those in training for ministry.
We'll also get to see our families, and have a few days just to rest and relax as a family ourselves. Please pray for our travels, our rest, and our relational re-connection on several levels.
Be back soon!
We'll be in Charlotte and in Columbia for a little under a week, then traveling and resting in Tennessee for another several days.
While in Charlotte, I have the privilege to give a couple of lectures at Reformed Theological Seminary. If you think of it, please pray for me to be of some use to those in training for ministry.
We'll also get to see our families, and have a few days just to rest and relax as a family ourselves. Please pray for our travels, our rest, and our relational re-connection on several levels.
Be back soon!
Monday, November 8, 2010
One more on communication in conflict
On Friday I posted some thoughts about communication while in conflict. Here's one more thought that I find useful; I meant to include this one in the previous post, and simply forgot it!
Don't be confident when discussing conversations you were not a part of. Instead, be ready to have your view and understanding of that conversation changed. I've been in discussions where I heard someone begin to tell another person what they said during another conversation. This gets especially sticky when the one doing the "telling" was not even a part of the original conversation! And it can be a real problem then, as well.
Often we will be told something in a report on what was said, and because of the source of that report we believe that we know the content of that conversation even as if we had been a part of it. But we are wrong in that belief-- it is just as likely that the person reporting to us mis-heard or misunderstood what was being said as it is that they got it right. Plus, we need to remember how strongly the Bible speaks against gossip and slander-- two sins that are far too easy to be a part of in the reporting of a conversation.
If we must bring up a previous conversation-- and especially one that we weren't a participant in-- it is far better to approach with questions, asking for clarification about both what was said AND what was meant. If we can approach such circumstances this way, we may come away with a much different (though more accurate) view of what was said.
Don't be confident when discussing conversations you were not a part of. Instead, be ready to have your view and understanding of that conversation changed. I've been in discussions where I heard someone begin to tell another person what they said during another conversation. This gets especially sticky when the one doing the "telling" was not even a part of the original conversation! And it can be a real problem then, as well.
Often we will be told something in a report on what was said, and because of the source of that report we believe that we know the content of that conversation even as if we had been a part of it. But we are wrong in that belief-- it is just as likely that the person reporting to us mis-heard or misunderstood what was being said as it is that they got it right. Plus, we need to remember how strongly the Bible speaks against gossip and slander-- two sins that are far too easy to be a part of in the reporting of a conversation.
If we must bring up a previous conversation-- and especially one that we weren't a participant in-- it is far better to approach with questions, asking for clarification about both what was said AND what was meant. If we can approach such circumstances this way, we may come away with a much different (though more accurate) view of what was said.
Friday, November 5, 2010
Communication in conflict
I'm still learning a lot about conflict and how to deal with it in a way that is loving, honest, and dignifying toward others. I imagine I'll be learning about that until glory; I certainly hope I don't STOP learning about it!
That said, I've picked up a thing or two about communication during times of conflict that I think are helpful. Here are a few thoughts:
Don't tell someone how they feel. Instead, tell them how YOU feel. I've heard people tell others something like, "You're angry..." or, "You're upset..." I've never seen this produce helpful results; if anything, the one being addressed usually does NOT feel the way they are told that they feel, and now they also feel misunderstood and defensive. The truth is that only you know how you feel, and only I know how I feel; if I try to anticipate their feelings, I'll probably get it wrong.
I recently had an interaction with another pastor who had been presumptuous in dealing with a particular circumstance in which we both had a part. I was frustrated, confused, and unsure how to deal with the aftermath of his presumption. I know that, often, frustration or confusion on my part comes across to others as anger. It was so helpful that my fellow pastor said, "I feel like you have withdrawn from our conversation, and I don't know if I've done something to upset you." That opened a door for me to communicate how I was feeling, and invited me back into collaboration with him. We stopped being adversaries and started being partners again.
Don't just listen to what they are saying. Instead, also listen to what they are telling you. We can use a lot of words when in dialogue about problems before us. Sometimes, those words can suggest things that are only a part of the story. I was once a part of a team that was giving counsel to a leader in authority who was dealing with someone who had acted wrongly; that authority figure asserted that he was trying to do things "by the book" and handle the offender accordingly. However, this leader had inadvertently run rough-shod over the other person, who had been open to correction and repentance before they were so caustically mis-handled!
I was grateful for the wisdom of another member of our team who lovingly pointed out to this leader how it was possible to "do the right thing in the wrong way." The authority figure wouldn't hear it, though, and we had to listen to what he was telling us beyond his words: he was unwilling to do things "by the book" if that meant that his authority would also have to include dealing lovingly with those under him. Sometimes words alone will actually mislead, but there is a larger message to be heard.
Don't judge circumstances (or people!) in the moment alone. Instead, assess them in context. I have faced problems with others that we focused on very precisely, and we worked out a great amount of detail about them. We may have arrived a a fair grasp of the immediate consequences of a problem, but often later learned that there were more factors involved than we took into consideration. This is often the case when someone has a very strong reaction about something, and our inclination can be to take that reaction at face value, in isolation of other factors. Consequently, we draw conclusions about the circumstances (and the person reacting to them) that are based solely on that moment.
I was in a meeting once where one member of a team checked another with a strong rebuke that, to the recipient, sounded like an unfounded accusation. The "accused" was so upset that he left the meeting. Afterward, in a conversation with a few of us, the "accused" man was clearly angry at the man who had rebuked him-- but we reminded this man of the other man's character, which was not that of a rash, accusing, and belligerent person that this man had determined him to be in the moment. In the larger context, those circumstances took on a different light.
Those are a few lessons I've learned-- sometimes the hard way!
That said, I've picked up a thing or two about communication during times of conflict that I think are helpful. Here are a few thoughts:
Don't tell someone how they feel. Instead, tell them how YOU feel. I've heard people tell others something like, "You're angry..." or, "You're upset..." I've never seen this produce helpful results; if anything, the one being addressed usually does NOT feel the way they are told that they feel, and now they also feel misunderstood and defensive. The truth is that only you know how you feel, and only I know how I feel; if I try to anticipate their feelings, I'll probably get it wrong.
I recently had an interaction with another pastor who had been presumptuous in dealing with a particular circumstance in which we both had a part. I was frustrated, confused, and unsure how to deal with the aftermath of his presumption. I know that, often, frustration or confusion on my part comes across to others as anger. It was so helpful that my fellow pastor said, "I feel like you have withdrawn from our conversation, and I don't know if I've done something to upset you." That opened a door for me to communicate how I was feeling, and invited me back into collaboration with him. We stopped being adversaries and started being partners again.
Don't just listen to what they are saying. Instead, also listen to what they are telling you. We can use a lot of words when in dialogue about problems before us. Sometimes, those words can suggest things that are only a part of the story. I was once a part of a team that was giving counsel to a leader in authority who was dealing with someone who had acted wrongly; that authority figure asserted that he was trying to do things "by the book" and handle the offender accordingly. However, this leader had inadvertently run rough-shod over the other person, who had been open to correction and repentance before they were so caustically mis-handled!
I was grateful for the wisdom of another member of our team who lovingly pointed out to this leader how it was possible to "do the right thing in the wrong way." The authority figure wouldn't hear it, though, and we had to listen to what he was telling us beyond his words: he was unwilling to do things "by the book" if that meant that his authority would also have to include dealing lovingly with those under him. Sometimes words alone will actually mislead, but there is a larger message to be heard.
Don't judge circumstances (or people!) in the moment alone. Instead, assess them in context. I have faced problems with others that we focused on very precisely, and we worked out a great amount of detail about them. We may have arrived a a fair grasp of the immediate consequences of a problem, but often later learned that there were more factors involved than we took into consideration. This is often the case when someone has a very strong reaction about something, and our inclination can be to take that reaction at face value, in isolation of other factors. Consequently, we draw conclusions about the circumstances (and the person reacting to them) that are based solely on that moment.
I was in a meeting once where one member of a team checked another with a strong rebuke that, to the recipient, sounded like an unfounded accusation. The "accused" was so upset that he left the meeting. Afterward, in a conversation with a few of us, the "accused" man was clearly angry at the man who had rebuked him-- but we reminded this man of the other man's character, which was not that of a rash, accusing, and belligerent person that this man had determined him to be in the moment. In the larger context, those circumstances took on a different light.
Those are a few lessons I've learned-- sometimes the hard way!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)